Point Digital Finance, Inc.
Atlassian License Snapshot
Jira
96
Total/ Monthly
Active User
92
Inactive User
4
Standard
HEALTHY
JSM
34
Total/ Monthly
Active User
34
Inactive User
0
Standard
HEALTHY
Loom
10
Total/ Monthly
Active User
3
Inactive User
7
Business
CRITICAL
Loom is underutilized
Insight: 30.00% utilization means 7 licenses are wasted. Cost reduction is possible.
3
Active Users
10
Monthly Billed
Scleraworx Recommendation
Product Optimization
- Remove 23 dormant users for immediate savings
- Audit JSM's 8 inactive agents; match active count
- Decide Loom's fate: cut 70% cost or adopt
- Analyze Guard's 102 licenses for cost exposure
- Jira is well-managed, maintain current license levels
Access Governance
- Implement monthly inactive user audits
- Audit 52 admin seats, enforce least-privilege access
- Remove vendor elevation; time-box vendor access
- Purge 53 inactive JSM customers to migrate risk
- Restrict group creation to prevent 26-group sprawl
Key Insights
-
Immediate Cost Savings
You can immediately save money by removing 23 dormant users (8 Jira, 8 JSM, 7 Loom) who are currently bleeding monthly charges for unused seats
-
Loom Has High Wastage
The Loom product shows extremely poor adoption with 70% wastage (7 of 10 licenses inactive), representing the highest-impact quick-win for cost reduction
-
Jira License Hygiene
Jira shows excellent license hygiene with a high 91.7% utilization rate, meaning only minimal cleanup is required for the 8 inactive users.
-
Stale Customer Access Risk
A significant 53 inactive members (45% bloat) in the JSM customer portal group represents stale customer access, posing a compliance and data exposure risk
-
Admin Overlap & Risk
There are 52 total admin seats across 12 groups, creating significant elevation redundancy and overlap, which necessitates an immediate audit and consolidation
-
Analysis Required for Guard Cost
Quantifying the risk and potential savings of the 102 Guard licenses demands immediate collection of utilization data to inform crucial cleanup and cost reduction decisions